Eye to eye: Finally decoded

Taher Shah has become an internet phenomenon. The once completely unknown singer who released a song and video ‘Eye to Eye’ two months ago, recently found himself becoming an overnight sensation.

51d2d76c7a2a0
A number of theories have been doing the rounds about Shah’s sudden fame. But it is the lyrics of his soft, romantic ditty that have been (and still are) the central focus of curiosity among millions of listeners and viewers who continue to watch the video and listen to the song over and over again.

Taher remains to be a mystery. He’s in his late 40s and by the looks of it seems to be an accomplished singer and songwriter. But the question is where Shah was when Pakistan’s pop music scene was booming in the 1990s?

The Shah phenomenon suggest that Shah is a trained composer, songwriter and vocalist who somehow missed the boom that Pakistan’s pop scene witnessed in the 1990s when Shah was in his 20s.

When, after a long wait, we did manage to get through to Shah (on the phone), Shah claimed: ‘Now’s the times of love ripe patience beholds precious time.’

As is apparent, his response is as enigmatic as the much debated lyrics of his mega hit song, ‘Eye to Eye.’

Though Shah continues to withhold the details of his background and life from the press, saying ‘it’s a private part of my life,’ we finally managed to get two of his close associates to reveal a few but vital aspects of Shah’s personality and life.

But they insisted that their names should not be published because Shah would then definitely fire them from his entourage of musicians, photographers, video cameramen and wardrobe designers.

‘He is a very private man,’ one of the two assistants that we talked to told us. ‘Even his closest friends rarely see him. He spends most of his time in his sprawling study doing research on love, spirituality and the human anatomy. Then he plays the saxophone deep into the night.’

According to his assistants, Shah was born in Mirpurkhas in the Sindh province of Pakistan sometime in the early 1960s. He comes from a family that struggled to make ends meet.

The assistants weren’t sure what kind of a childhood Shah had but added that he had to wait tables at roadside restaurants in Mirpurkhas to supplement his studies at school and college.

‘He would work at these restaurants from morning till afternoon, attend evening school and then college where he studied biology,’ one of the assistants informed us. ‘He would then read books on agriculture and botany at home and play the tuba deep into the night.’

There are also rumours about Shah being arrested in July 1977 when military General, Ziaul Haq, toppled Z A. Bhutto’s government.
51d2d2008128f
Tahir in late 70s

‘We have heard that as well,’ the assistant said. ‘But Shah doesn’t talk much about that episode. He says at the time of Bhutto’s Saheb’s fall, he (Shah) was busy playing the flute deep into the night.’
‘It’s a very touchy subject for him’, the other assistant added.

Another rumour doing the rounds is that Shah played the saxophone on some songs recorded by Pakistan’s seminal pop vocalist Alamgir in the early 1980s.

‘All we know is that he moved to Karachi in the 1980s,’ said one of the assistants. ‘He used to wait tables at a restaurant in the Tariq Road area of the city to supplement his studies at the Karachi University where he had enrolled as a student of alternative psychology.’

The assistants, however, confirmed, that Shah did play the saxophone as a sessions musician on some songs recorded by famous Pakistani pop singer of the 1980s, Tehseen Javed.

‘Javed looked a lot like Alamgir,’ said one of the assistants. ‘Maybe that’s why some people think Shah Jee played with Alamgir. But it was on a few songs recorded by Javed that Shah Jee played the saxophone. He wanted to quit waiting tables and supplement his studies and research as a session musician.’

But we come back to the same question: ‘Where was Shah when bands like Vital Signs, Junoon and The Strings were kick-starting a major pop wave in Pakistan from the late 1980s and across the 1990s?

Samsung galaxy note 2 launched!

Samsung took the wraps off a sequel to its popular Galaxy Note smartphone. The Galaxy Note 10.1, which went on sale in Germany and the United Arab Emirates, will soon be launched in pakistani markets. The new Galaxy Note smartphone comes with a host of new features and is twice as wide as its predecessor and nearly the size of a tablet.

Armed with a 1.4GHz quad-core processor and 2GB RAM for enhanced performance, Galaxy Note 10.1 is designed to simplify idea capture, information access, and multi-tasking, making each easier and faster. The Galaxy Note 10.1 – powered by Google’s Android 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich) features a touchscreen which is 10.1-inches measured diagonally, considerably wider than the 5.3-inch screen of the previous Note.

Like Galaxy Note, it comes with a stylus called the ‘S pen’ to write notes or draw on the screen. The new version allows users to split the screen in half to view two programs at once. The device also includes a 5-megapixel main camera and a 1.9-megapixel front-facing camera.

 

Personally, being a samsung note user, i think this time they have overdone the size. My note is the max size with which i am confortable with. I doubt if i would go for this!

New andriod OS: Jelly bean!

You may still be salivating for Ice Cream Sandwich, but today, there’s a new Android dessert in town.

Google officially took the wraps off of Android 4.1, Jelly Bean, at its Google I/O developers’ conference this morning. The new OS will ship on the Nexus 7 tablet also announced this week; it’s scheduled to roll out to the Galaxy Nexus and Motorola Xoom in July The Nexus S is also confimed to get the Jelly Bean upgrade at some point in the near future.

I’ve been spending the afternoon using Jelly Bean on both the Nexus 7 tablet and a GSM Galaxy Nexus phone. Here are my first impressions:

Android 4.1 is a refinement — not a ground-shifting upgrade.

Ice Cream Sandwich was a massive upgrade to the Android platform. Jelly Bean is far more incremental. It’s really more akin to the Froyo to Gingerbread (2.2 to 2.3) upgrade than the Gingerbread to Ice Cream Sandwich (2.3 to 4.0) bump.

That said, Android 4.1 is certainly not insignificant. It has some powerful performance enhancements and some sweet new features, too.

Android 4.1’s performance improvements are definitely noticeable.

Google calls its Jelly Bean performance push “Project Butter” because it’s meant to make everything run more smoothly than ever. Based on the time I’ve spent testing Android 4.1 so far, the buttery name is well earned.

So what’s “Project Butter” all about? Take a deep breath: Google improved the system frame-rate and display refresh signal and also developed a new touch input system that anticipates where your fingers will land and gives the CPU an extra shot of power when you touch the screen. Blah, blah, blah — that’s all geek speak. What matters is that Jelly Bean is like ICS, only noticeably smoother and faster.

Some areas where you can see the difference are in rotating your phone, launching the “recent apps” list, and transitioning between the home screen and app drawer. I followed Google’s suggestion and compared these processes on a 4.0-level Galaxy Nexus and a 4.1-level version of the same phone, and you can definitely see a noticeable improvement in the 4.1 device.

Android 4.1 has a new voice command system — and it’s actually really good.

Jelly Bean expands upon Google’s existing Voice Actions technology to provide a more natural language-oriented system. The older command prompts still work — saying “note to self” to send yourself a message, “navigate to” to launch turn-by-turn navigation, and so forth — but now, you can ask regular ol’ questions as well.

I’ll be honest: I’m not usually a fan of voice assistant-type technology. Apple’s Siri strikes me as rather gimmicky, and Samsung’s S Voice flat-out sucks. So I’ve been pretty surprised at how impressive and potentially useful the new Jelly Bean voice system actually seems.

The system resides in the Android search interface, which you can now access by touching the search bar on the home screen or by swiping your finger upward from the bottom of the screen (using a two-finger gesture positioned around the app drawer). You can also get to it directly from the lock screen, if you don’t have a PIN or pattern set, by swiping upward from there. To activate the voice command function, you simply say “Google” — while at the Android search interface — and your device starts listening.

I threw a bunch of stuff Google’s way, and with each query, its speed and accuracy blew me away. When I asked where a good Thai restaurant was nearby, the system presented me with a map and a list of places in the vicinity. When I asked how tall Adam Carolla is, the system showed me a card with his picture and height (and even read the answer out loud). It showed me a list of Web results beneath it, too, in case I wanted to read more.

The other interesting part of the Jelly Bean search experience is something called Google Now. With your permission, Google Now combines data from your activity and various Google services to deliver custom info cards catered to your needs. You might see a card showing the day’s weather in the morning, for example, and one showing when the next train leaves from your platform in the evening. Google Now can even anticipate an upcoming calendar appointment, factor in the best method of transportation and current traffic delays, and alert you at the exact time you need to leave in order to arrive on schedule.

Google Now sounds really cool. Since it’s based on ongoing usage and patterns, I haven’t been able to test it out much yet, but it looks very promising.

Android 4.1 notifications are noteworthy.

Notifications have always been one of Android’s strengths. Jelly Bean makes them even stronger.

The entire Android notification panel gets a bit of a makeover with 4.1. The most significant change, though, is the addition of “active” notifications. You can see detailed info about multiple emails, for example, or full views of photos shared with you on Google+. You can even act on a meeting notification to email everyone else involved and let them know you’re running late. Not too shabby.

Android 4.1 has a lot more worth exploring.

I’m just scratching the surface of what’s new in Jelly Bean. The Android 4.1 upgrade has a bunch of other fresh stuff, ranging from a newly improved keyboard to widgets that automatically resize themselves to fit into your home screen. The Camera and Gallery have new simple photo-viewing gestures, and Android Beam allows for extra types of contact-free NFC interactions. And that’s not even all of it.

I’ll be getting to know Android 4.1 much more over the coming days. Stay tuned for more on my experiences with the OS and my impressions of how it compares to ICS and other Android releases.

Ice cream sandwich update in pakistan

Today, i got my update on samsung galaxy note, here in kuwait. In pakistan, it is still not rolled out and unfortunately, samsung says it might take another few weeks. So, i will keep you all informed. Here is the screen shot of my update.

Note that firmware is updated through kies. If your internet connection is NOT wi-fi, it will not show you an update.

After the update, i have noticed the following:

Slightly newer user interface

Loading for applications are faster

New design of some of the applications

More camera options

My galaxy note

Finally, bought galaxy note in white colour! Have to admit that i was quite reluctant before switching from iphones. When i finally made up my mind, and did my research, went to eureaka in shuwaikh. They were selling it for 225 for black and 235 for white colour. Went straight to x-cite in al-rai, they were selling it for  233 for white. After two days of using it, belive me for all those die hard iphone fans, its time to switch to note.

Graphic are brilliant, and yes, iphone feels tiny…..

Galaxy galaxy note vs iphone 4s

We see how Apple’s brand new iPhone 4S stacks up against Samsung’s big Galaxy Note.

Form: The Samsung Galaxy Note is a sizeable piece of kit, for a phone anyway, measuring 146mm tall and 83mm wide, but despite this it’s still a wafer thin device at a mere 9.7mm. Even so, it’s got a fair bit of heft to it at 178g. We like the slick and minimalist design which compliments the large screen space nicely. It’s a very clean, neat and tidy design with not much to distract the eye, allowing you to focus on the glorious visuals. Apple’s iPhone 4S looks exactly the same as its predecessor, the iPhone 4. There’s been no external overhaul whatsoever and frankly we’re more than a little tired of the current iPhone design.

Winner – Samsung Galaxy Note

Display: The Galaxy Note has an amazing display, for starters it is simply huge, approaching tablet levels in fact at 5.3-inches. It’s a Super Amoled capacitive touchscreen made from reinforced Gorilla Glass and featuring multi-touch. The phone is also fitted with accelerometer and gyro sensors for auto-rotate functions. Screen resolution is an impressive 800×1280 pixels with a pixel density of 285 pixels-per-inch (ppi). Apple’s new device hasn’t changed a bit, the iPhone 4S still has the same 3.5 inch LED backlit TFT retina display. The capacitive touchscreen clocks in at 640×960 pixels and a pixel density of 330 pixels-per-inch. It’s also got a scratch-resistant coating which resists grubby fingerprints. Multi-touch input, an acceleromter and gyro sensors complete the package. Despite the fact we hardly approve of Apple’s stagnant approach the retina display is still brilliant thanks to its very high 330 ppi pixel density. We prefer the size of the Galaxy Note, however and it’s still a hugely impressive piece of kit.

Winner – iPhone 4S

Storage: Samsung’s Galaxy Note comes in two storage variants with either 16GB or 32GB available, it also has support for a further 32GB via microSD and comes with a 2GB card as standard. To help the processor in its duties it also packs 1GB of RAM. The iPhone 4S has three options for 16GB, 32GB or 64GB so it out maneuvers the Galaxy Note quite easily here. Apple’s phone loses out on RAM though with only 512MB. There’s still no card support, but then we rather expected as much. The iPhone wins here by providing a higher top-end storage option, which counts for a lot, but we’re still dissapointed about the lack of a card slot and a lacklustre quantity of RAM.

Winner – iPhone 4S

Processor: Samsung’s device carries some clout with its dual core ARM Cortex-A9 processor, it’s clocked at 1.4GHz and runs the Exynos chipset, complete with a Mali-400MP graphics processing unit (GPU). Apple has crammed all the power of an iPad 2 into the comparatively small chassis of the iPhone 4S, thanks to a 1GHz dual core ARM Cortex-A9 processor running the Apple A5 chipset and a SGX 543MP2 GPU. It’s a valiant attempt from Apple for the company’s first dual core phone, but it’s still not enough to topple what Samsung regularly churns out and that faster clock speed and Mali GPU will make all the difference.

Winner – Samsung Galaxy Note

Operating System: The Galaxy Note runs on Google’s Android 2.3 Gingerbread platform. Although it runs smoothly and is relatively stable it isn’t as feature packed as subsequent Android builds, as well as the new Microsoft Windows Phone Mango platform. We like the multi-tasking, which is top-notch, but apart from this we’re left wanting for something a bit beefier. iOS 5, which the iPhone 4S runs, promises much more content for your money with an integrated BlackBerry Messenger style iMessage service and a Siri voice-powered virtual Assistant.

Winner – Apple iPhone 4S

Camera: Both phones feature 8-megapixel primaries at a 3264×2448 pixel resolution and capable of 1080p video capture.

Winner – Draw

Final Thoughts: We’re very impressed with the Samsung Galaxy Note, and not so impressed with Apple’s rehash of the iPhone 4, which is certainly as good as some Samsung and Android devices, but nothing exceptional. The iPhone 4S has the better operating system but apart from this we think the Galaxy Note is a better choice.

At electrozan, 4s cost 229KD and samsung note costs 225KD

IOS5 update

 

Firstly, let me apologize for not posting for sometime as i was not well.  Secondly, as i said as a die hard iphone fan, i was disappointed after 4s launch. Then i was disappointed after i updated IOS5! Why, because its the same design. I updated yesterday. Although it says it has 200 new hidden feature, but i couldnt identify more than 10!

So, don’t be exicted to get an update let alone shifting to 4s!

New ‘Pirates’ sails old familiar, seas

At two hours and 16 minutes, “Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides” — the fourth film in the ridiculously successful Disney franchise — is the shortest in the series. But it still feels overlong and overstuffed: needlessly convoluted yet, at the same time, phoned-in.

And the fact that this one’s in 3-D — because everything’s in 3-D, silly thing — does nothing to liven up the action. Those three-dimensional digital effects mainly consist of various swords and snakes and such being flung at our faces.

Boo! Did you jump?

That’s not to say this summer behemoth doesn’t have its thrilling moments. Rob Marshall (“Chicago,” “Nine”) takes over for Gore Verbinski, who directed the first three “Pirates” movies, and his knack for choreography comes shining through in individual set pieces. An early chase sequence, in which Johnny Depp as the randy Capt. Jack Sparrow escapes the clutches of the puffy, bloviating King George II (Richard Griffiths), is expertly staged. Jack swings from chandeliers and hangs from ropes, straddles moving carriages and steers a cart full of flaming coal, and we’re right there alongside him every breathless step of the way.

Similarly, a nighttime attack by mermaids — beautiful, seductive, deadly mermaids with razor-sharp teeth — provides a jolt. Because what’s hotter than mermaids, except maybe naughty vampire mermaids? And the first time Jack crosses paths (and swords) with his old flame Angelica, played by a spirited Penelope Cruz, it’s in a lengthy, fluid battle across beams and atop barrels. (Oddly, Cruz and Depp, who co-starred together in 2001’s “Blow,” don’t have a whole lot of chemistry once they have to actually stop and talk to each other.)

It’s everything that happens in between, all the chatter and the exposition, that make the latest “Pirates” such a repetitive bore.

Depp’s performance, which seemed like such a free, goofy, inspired bit of work when the first film came out back in 2003, now feels so dialed-down and obvious, it’s as if he could do it in his sleep. With the (unexplained) absence of Orlando Bloom and Keira Knightley this time around, Depp’s Sparrow is now front and center — he’s almost the voice of reason — rather than the bejeweled and eyelinered clown riffing in the corner, commenting in the action.

As for the plot — not that it matters, really — this time the script from Ted Elliott and Terry Rossio centers on a search for the fabled Fountain of Youth. Jack has no ship anymore, so when Angelica kidnaps him and drags him aboard the Queen Anne’s Revenge, the ship belonging to the fearsome Blackbeard (a constrained Ian McShane), he’s stuck going along for the ride.

Blackbeard seeks the fountain after receiving a prophecy that he’s going to die in two weeks. But the Spanish are after it, too. And so are the English, led by Jack’s deceitful old nemesis Barbossa (Geoffrey Rush).

Did we mention that there are zombie pirates aboard Blackbeard’s ship? The fact that they’re zombies makes no sense at all — I mean, come on, wouldn’t they be trying to eat the brains of the living pirates at every opportunity? — and feels like yet another attempt to inject arbitrary weirdness in the place of genuine inspiration.

Also on board is a hunky man of faith with just the right amount of facial scruff named Philip (Sam Claflin), who falls for one of the mermaids (Astrid Berges-Frisbey), who’s been taken prisoner because her tears are required to activate the Fountain of Youth waters. (Don’t ask.) Ostensibly, this relationship is intended to replace the young-people-in-love subplot that Bloom and Knightley provided, but it’s so full of banal angst, it feels a little too much like something you’d see in the “Twilight” series.

But surely that’s coming in the fifth Pirates movie: sexy werewolves.

“Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides,” a Walt Disney Pictures release, is PG-13 for intense sequences of action/adventure violence, some frightening images, sensuality and innuendo. Running time: 136 minutes. One and a half stars out of four.

Kate Middleton and Princess Diana – worlds apart

From the moment Prince William put his mother’s sapphire and diamond ring on Kate Middleton’s finger, comparisons between his wife-to-be and the late princess Diana became inevitable.

More than a decade after Diana’s death, the “People’s Princess” remains adored and the new royal bride will be measured against the young, shy blonde who captivated the world at her wedding to Prince Charles in 1981.

The royals are understandably wary of comparisons between the two women, and William himself insisted soon after the engagement that “no one is trying to fill my mother’s shoes”.

Diana’s marriage was a famously unhappy union which broke down amid infidelity on both sides, ending in a bitter divorce and then tragedy, when the princess died in a Paris car crash in 1997.

It is not a tale to comfort a nervous bride, but fortunately, commentators see more differences than similarities between the two women.

Despite her lack of aristocratic blood, Kate will be far better prepared than Diana ever was for royal life when she walks down the aisle of Westminster Abbey on April 29.

“Kate’s been very carefully groomed, it’s been a long process over a period of time and she’s got people around her who understand the modern media.

“She knows exactly what she’s getting,” said Max Clifford, a top British PR man who has represented many celebrities.

Kate and William have been together for eight years, whereas Diana was courted for just six months. In fact, Kate has been waiting so long for her boyfriend to pop the question that the press dubbed her “Waity Katy”.

But Clifford says the length of time puts their relationship on a strong footing, saying “William seems to be totally in love with her and vice versa”.

The young couple have had a very modern courtship.

They lived together while at St Andrews University in Scotland, where they met, and in recent months Kate has stayed with William on the island of Anglesey in Wales, where he works as a helicopter search and rescue pilot.

At the age of 29, Kate also has considerable life experience compared to Diana, who was only 20 on her wedding day, 12 years younger than Charles. Just five months separate Kate and William, who is 28.

Diana had left school before finishing her studies and her work experience was limited to a stint at a nursery.

By contrast, Kate graduated with a degree in art history from a top university, although her jobs as an accessories buyer for a clothing brand and then for her family’s party goods firm have been criticised as lightweight.

Kate also had a happier and more stable childhood than Diana, whose parents divorced when she was young. Kate is close to her mother Carole and sister Pippa, her maid of honour, and says her family is a major source of support.

Up to now, William’s bride has also had a better relationship with the press, which hounded the late princess right up to the moment of her death.

Despite a rocky start following Kate’s move to London after graduation, when photographers mobbed her every time she left the house, warning letters from lawyers and the palace have caused the media to back off.

Kate “is an intelligent girl. She has a good head on her shoulders and is so much older than Diana was and she knows William,” said royal historian Hugo Vickers.

The royal family “must be delighted. She’s cautious. She’s very measured — confidence is not quite the right word, but she is assured,” he added.

Diana was beautiful, charismatic and almost universally loved, but she was also unstable and the explosive fallout of her split with Charles cast a pall over the royal family that is only now starting to lift.

She also overshadowed the other royals, staying firmly in the limelight even after the divorce through her charitable causes.

“Diana became far more popular worldwide than the royal family, and in this country — she was the one everyone wanted to see, wanted to hear, wanted to be around,” said Clifford.

The royals “would have learned from that”, he said.

Kate has shown no sign of Diana’s love of publicity, although only time will tell how far her careful plans survive the pressure of being a fully paid-up member of the royal family.